ViaInvest VS Peerberry

A compelling choice between regulatory protection and higher returns

ViaInvest

4.0

Regulated, higher yields, limited liquidity

37,000+ investors Founded 2016

Peerberry

4.2

Unregulated, lower yields, better liquidity

72,000+ investors Founded 2017

Head-to-Head Comparison

Annual Return
ViaInvest
11.5%
Peerberry
11.0%
Minimum Investment
ViaInvest
€50
Peerberry
€10
Regulation
ViaInvest
IBF License (MiFID II)
Peerberry
Unregulated (Croatia)
Secondary Market
ViaInvest
No
Peerberry
Yes (Fee-free)
Buyback Guarantee
ViaInvest
Yes (60-day)
Peerberry
Variable
Auto-Invest
ViaInvest
Yes
Peerberry
Yes
Investor Base
ViaInvest
37,000+ investors
Peerberry
72,000+ investors

Returns & Yield Analysis

ViaInvest offers 11.5% returns versus Peerberry's 11.0% - a 0.5% premium for ViaInvest. On €10,000, this equals €50 extra annually. ViaInvest's higher yield reflects its MiFID II regulation providing structural stability that allows slightly better negotiated lending rates. Peerberry's unregulated status hasn't prevented competitive returns, but ViaInvest's modest edge rewards investors for accepting tighter liquidity constraints.

Regulation & Legal Protection

This is the critical differentiator. ViaInvest operates under MiFID II regulation, providing investor protections equivalent to traditional investment firms. Peerberry has no such regulatory oversight. If ViaInvest becomes insolvent, EU investor protection covers losses up to statutory limits. If Peerberry fails, you have minimal legal recourse. This regulatory advantage justifies ViaInvest's choice for conservative investors, despite lower liquidity.

Liquidity & Flexibility

ViaInvest has no secondary market, making your capital completely illiquid until loan maturity. Peerberry offers a fee-free secondary market for selling loans early. This is a major practical difference: if you need emergency liquidity, ViaInvest offers none while Peerberry offers an exit. However, if you're a "set it and forget it" investor, this doesn't matter. The liquidity advantage clearly favors Peerberry for flexible portfolio management.

Default Protection & Buyback Guarantees

ViaInvest offers buyback guarantees, though with a 60-day processing delay. Peerberry offers variable buyback tied to lending partners, meaning no platform-level protection. For default risk, ViaInvest is superior: you're protected from loan defaults, while Peerberry exposes you to lending partner insolvency. This significantly favors ViaInvest's risk profile.

Platform Community & Stability

Peerberry's 72,000 investors and 9-year history exceed ViaInvest's 37,000 investors and 10-year history. The investor counts are comparable in scale, both representing substantial communities. Peerberry's slightly larger base provides more diverse lending relationships and arguably stronger operational infrastructure for handling secondary market trading. However, ViaInvest's regulatory oversight partially compensates for smaller community size.

Minimum Investment & Accessibility

Peerberry's €10 minimum is more accessible than ViaInvest's €50 minimum. For small investors or those testing platforms, Peerberry is more practical. However, this is only relevant if you're investing less than €50; larger investors won't notice the difference.

Key Trade-offs Summary

ViaInvest offers: Regulatory protection, higher returns (0.5%), guaranteed buyback, but NO secondary market liquidity and higher minimum investment.

Peerberry offers: Secondary market liquidity, larger community, lower minimum investment, but NO regulation and weaker default protection.

The Verdict

Choose ViaInvest if: You prioritize regulatory protection and guaranteed buyback insurance. You can commit capital for the loan term without needing liquidity. You prefer the safety net of MiFID II oversight. You're comfortable with higher minimum investment (€50+).

Choose Peerberry if: You need secondary market exit options for flexibility. You want exposure to a larger investor community. You prefer lower capital entry (€10+). You're comfortable with less regulation in exchange for more trading freedom.

Optimal Strategy: Many sophisticated investors use both. Consider allocating 60% to ViaInvest for regulatory protection and higher yield, with 40% to Peerberry for liquidity and secondary market access. This captures ViaInvest's superior risk profile while maintaining portfolio flexibility. Alternatively, use ViaInvest for core long-term holdings and Peerberry for tactical positions you may need to exit.

Choose Your P2P Lending Strategy

Both platforms: 1% cashback bonus through our links